Premium
Inhibition of volume‐regulated anion channels in cultured endothelial cells by the anti‐oestrogens clomiphene and nafoxidine
Author(s) -
Maertens Chantal,
Droogmans Guy,
Chakraborty Prabir,
Nilius Bernd
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703786
Subject(s) - endocrinology , medicine , chemistry , pharmacology , biology
We have used the whole‐cell patch clamp technique to study the effect of the partial anti‐oestrogens clomiphene and nafoxidine, the pure anti‐oestrogens ICI 182,780 and RU 58,668 and the oestrogen β‐estradiol, on the volume‐regulated anion channel (VRAC) in cultured pulmonary artery endothelial (CPAE) cells. In contrast to the pure anti‐oestrogens and β‐estradiol, clomiphene and nafoxidine potently inhibited the volume‐sensitive chloride current, I Cl,swell , activated by challenging CPAE cells with a 25% hypotonic solution. For clomiphene, the estimated IC 50 and Hill coefficient were 1.03±0.14 μ M and 1.40±0.21 respectively. In the case of nafoxidine, these values were 1.61±0.29 μ M and 1.24±0.19. The inhibition induced by the pure enantiomers of clomiphene, zuclomiphene and enclomiphene, was not different from that of the racemic mixture, indicating that the interaction between clomiphene and VRAC is not stereoselective. Clomiphene and nafoxidine inhibited proliferation of CPAE cells. Half‐maximal inhibition was found at 1.98±0.17 and 1.66±0.21 μ M respectively, concentrations similar to those for half‐maximal block of VRAC. In conclusion, the nonsteroidal partial anti‐oestrogens nafoxidine and clomiphene are potent inhibitors of volume‐regulated anion channels. The inhibition by clomiphene is not stereoselective and occurs at concentrations close to therapeutically relevant concentrations. Finally, both drugs inhibit the proliferation of endothelial cells.British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 132 , 135–142; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703786