z-logo
Premium
Role of EDHF in the vasodilatory effect of loop diuretics in guinea‐pig mesenteric resistance arteries
Author(s) -
Pourageaud Fabrice,
BappelGozalbes Catherine,
Marthan Roger,
Freslon JeanLouis
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703693
Subject(s) - apamin , iberiotoxin , charybdotoxin , chemistry , mesenteric arteries , vasodilation , endocrinology , medicine , acetylcholine , potassium channel , pharmacology , artery
Relaxing effect of loop diuretics, piretanide and furosemide in comparison with acetylcholine (ACh) was investigated in guinea‐pig isolated mesenteric resistance arteries. Concentration‐response curves to ACh (0.001–10 μ M ) and diuretics (0.0001–1 μ M ) were constructed in noradrenaline (10–30 μ M )‐precontracted arteries incubated either in normal physiological salt solution (PSS) or in 30 m M KCl PSS (K‐PSS). In PSS, maximal relaxations (R max ) and pD 2 to ACh were 87±2% and 7.1±0.1 ( n =10). L ‐N G ‐nitro‐arginine methyl ester ( L ‐NAME, 100 μ M ) reduced R max by 20% ( P <0.01, n =7) and pD 2 by 10% ( P <0.01). In contrast, indomethacin (10 μ M ) increased R max by 19% ( P <0.01, n =8) and pD 2 by 10% ( P <0.05). Combination of L ‐NAME+indomethacin reversed the effect observed with either of these inhibitors used alone. In K‐PSS, R max was attenuated by 40% ( P <0.001, n =6) compared to PSS. L ‐NAME reduced R max by 65% ( P <0.01, n =5) and increased pD 2 by 15 fold. L ‐NAME+indomethacin suppressed the resistant relaxation. In PSS+ L ‐NAME+indomethacin, inhibitors of small (SK Ca ; apamin, 0.1 μ M ) and large (BK Ca ; iberiotoxin and charybdotoxin, 0.1 μ M ) conductance Ca 2+ ‐sensitive K − ‐channels used alone had little effect on the ACh‐response. Combination of apamin+iberiotoxin reduced R max by 40% ( P <0.05, n =7) while apamin+charybdotoxin fully abolished the resistant relaxation. In PSS, piretanide and furosemide induced relaxation with R max : 89±3% vs 84±5% and pD 2 : 8.5±0.1 vs 7.7±0.2 ( P <0.01) for piretanide ( n =11) and furosemide ( n =10), respectively. Endothelial abrasion suppressed relaxation to diuretics. L ‐NAME and indomethacin used alone or in combination did not significantly modify the response to diuretics. In K‐PSS, piretanide‐induced relaxation was abolished whereas that to furosemide was reduced by 70% ( P <0.001, n =9) compared to PSS and was suppressed by L ‐NAME+indomethacin. In PSS+ L ‐NAME+indomethacin, apamin slightly reduced relaxation to diuretics whereas charybdotoxin or iberiotoxin abolished the response. These results indicate that ACh‐evoked relaxation is mediated by both NO/PGl 2 ‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms. The EDHF‐dependent component relies on activation of Ca 2+ ‐activated K + channels, is sensitive to a combination of apamin+charybdotoxin and to a smaller degree to a combination of apamin+iberiotoxin. Loop diuretic‐induced relaxation is endothelium‐dependent, appears to be mediated by NO, PGl 2 and EDHF for furosemide and EDHF only for piretanide. For the two diuretics, opening of BK Ca channels may be involved in the relaxation.British Journal of Pharmacology (2000) 131 , 1211–1219; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703693

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here