z-logo
Premium
Sulphonylurea drugs reduce hypoxic damage in the isolated perfused rat kidney
Author(s) -
Engbersen Richard,
Moons Miek M,
Wouterse Alfons C,
Dijkman Henry B,
Kramers Cees,
Smits Paul,
Russel Frans G M
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703469
Subject(s) - tolbutamide , glibenclamide , kidney , hypoxia (environmental) , endocrinology , medicine , chemistry , excretion , pharmacology , biology , diabetes mellitus , oxygen , organic chemistry
Sulphonylurea drugs have been shown to protect against hypoxic damage in isolated proximal tubules of the kidney. In the present study we investigated whether these drugs can protect against hypoxic damage in a whole kidney preparation. Tolbutamide (200 μ M ) and glibenclamide (10 μ M ) were applied to the isolated perfused rat kidney prior to changing the gassing from oxygen to nitrogen for 30 min. Hypoxic perfusions resulted in an increased fractional excretion of glucose (FE % glucose 14.3±1.5 for hypoxic perfusions vs 4.9±1.6 for normoxic perfusions, mean±s.e.mean, P <0.05), which could be completely restored by 200 μ M tolbutamide (5.7±0.4 for tolbutamide vs 14.3±1.5 for untreated hypoxic kidneys, P <0.01). Furthermore, tolbutamide reduced the total amount of LDH excreted in the urine (220±100 mU for tolbutamide vs 1220±160 mU for untreated hypoxic kidneys, P <0.01). Comparable results were obtained with glibenclamide (10 μ M ). In agreement with the effect on functional parameters, ultrastructural analysis of proximal tubules showed increased brush border preservation in tolbutamide treated kidneys compared to untreated hypoxic kidneys. We conclude that glibenclamide and tolbutamide are both able to reduce hypoxic damage to proximal tubules in the isolated perfused rat kidney when applied in the appropriate concentrations.British Journal of Pharmacology (2000) 130 , 1678–1684; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703469

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here