z-logo
Premium
The effect of inhibitors of receptor internalization on the desensitization and resensitization of three G s ‐coupled receptor responses
Author(s) -
Mundell Stuart J,
Kelly Eamonn
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702234
Subject(s) - internalization , homologous desensitization , agonist , desensitization (medicine) , receptor , g protein coupled receptor , adenosine , biology , adenosine receptor , endocrinology , medicine , pharmacology , chemistry , biochemistry
Many G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to internalize following agonist exposure, however the relative importance of this mechanism for the desensitization and resensitization of different GPCRs is unclear. In the present study, we have pretreated NG108‐15 cells with hypertonic sucrose or concanavalin A (con A), to investigate the effects of these inhibitors of internalization on the agonist‐induced desensitization and subsequent resensitization of three G s ‐coupled receptor responses. Incubation of cells with sucrose or con A did not affect subsequent acute agonist stimulation of the A 2A adenosine receptor or the agonist‐induced desensitization of this receptor response. However, the resensitization of the A 2A adenosine receptor response following agonist removal was abolished in the presence of sucrose or con A. Sucrose or con A treatment affected neither the desensitization nor resensitization of IP‐prostanoid receptor responsiveness. On the other hand con A but not sucrose reduced the agonist‐induced desensitization of secretin receptor responsiveness. However, secretin receptor responsiveness did not resensitize within the time period studied whether or not inhibitors of internalization were present. These results indicate that receptor internalization appears to subserve different functions for different GPCRs.British Journal of Pharmacology (1998) 125 , 1594–1600; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702234

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here