Premium
Purinoceptor activation of chloride transport in cystic fibrosis and CFTR‐transfected pancreatic cell lines
Author(s) -
O'Reilly Catherine M,
O'Farrell Anne M,
Ryan Michael P
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701990
Subject(s) - cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator , adenosine , forskolin , endocrinology , medicine , chemistry , chloride channel , efflux , adenosine receptor , receptor , biology , biochemistry , stimulation , cystic fibrosis , agonist
The regulation of chloride efflux from cystic fibrosis pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells (CFPAC‐1) and wild‐type CFTR‐transfected CFPAC‐1 cells (TPAC) was compared. Forskolin (10 μ M ) stimulated chloride efflux from the corrected TPAC cells but not from CFPAC‐1 cells. Chloride efflux from both cell types was activated by thapsigargin (0.5 μ M ). The nucleotides ATP and UTP and the non‐hydrolyzable ATP analogue, adenosine 5′‐O‐(3‐thio) triphosphate (ATPγS), stimulated chloride efflux from both cell types. None of the other P 2 purinoceptor agonists investigated elicited a response. The order of potency was ATPUTPATPγS. Adenosine (10–100 μ M ) activated choride efflux from the TPAC but not the CFPAC cell line with no increase in intracellular cyclic AMP. Small but statistically significant inhibitions of the adenosine‐(50 μ M )‐stimulated increase in chloride efflux were elicited by the A 1 receptor antagonist 8‐cyclopentyl‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (CPX, 100 n M ) and the A 2 receptor antagonist 3,7‐dimethyl‐1‐propylargylxanthine (DMPX, 10 μ M ). The A 2A receptor antagonist 8‐(3‐chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC, 100 n M ) had no significant effect. These results provide evidence for the regulation of chloride efflux by P2Y 2 purinoceptors in genetically‐corrected and CF pancreatic cell lines. Studies with adenosine receptor antagonists indicate some possible involvement of A 1 and A 2 (but not A 2A ) receptors in the adenosine stimulation of chloride efflux, but the relatively small effects of the inhibitors coupled with lack of increase in cyclic AMP and a response only in the CFTR‐transfected cells also suggests a possible direct effect of adenosine on CFTR.British Journal of Pharmacology (1998) 124 , 1597–1606; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701990