z-logo
Premium
Modulation of transcription factor NF‐κB by enantiomers of the nonsteroidal drug ibuprofen
Author(s) -
Scheuren Nicole,
Bang Holger,
Münster Tino,
Brune Kay,
Pahl Andreas
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
british journal of pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.432
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1476-5381
pISSN - 0007-1188
DOI - 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701652
Subject(s) - ibuprofen , chemistry , pharmacology , enantiomer , transcription factor , mechanism of action , in vitro , stereochemistry , biochemistry , biology , gene
The nonsteroidal drug ibuprofen exists as an R (−)‐ and S (+)‐enantiomer. Only the S (+)‐enantiomer is an effective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitor, while the R (−)‐enantiomer is inactive in this respect. Thus the molecular mechanism by which R (−)‐ibuprofen exerts its anti‐inflammatory and antinociceptive effects remains unknown. In this study the effects of the enantiomers of ibuprofen on modulation of transcription factors have been examined with electrophoretic mobility‐shift assay (EMSA), transient transfection experiments, confocal immunofluorescence and nuclear import experiments, to determine their selectivity and potency as inhibitors of the activation of transcription factor nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB).R (−)‐ibuprofen (IC 50 : 121.8 μ M ) as well as the S (+)‐enantiomer (IC 50 : 61.7 μ M ) inhibited the activation of NF‐κB in response to T‐cell stimulation. The effect of ibuprofen was specific because, at concentrations up to 10 m M , ibuprofen did not affect the heat shock transcription factor (HSF) and the activation of NF‐κB by prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ). Very high concentrations of ibuprofen (20 m M ) did not prevent NF‐κB binding to DNA in vitro . Immunofluorescence and nuclear import experiments indicate that the site of ibuprofen action appeared to be upstream of the dissociation of the NF‐κB‐IκB‐complex. Our data raise the possibility that R (−)‐ibuprofen exerts some of its effects by inhibition of NF‐κB activation.British Journal of Pharmacology (1998) 123 , 645–652; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701652

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here