Open AccessA comparison of experimental assays and analytical methods for genome-wide identification of active enhancers
Author(s) -
Yao Li,
Jin Liang,
Abdullah Ozer,
Alden King-Yung Leung,
John T. Lis,
Haiyuan Yu
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
nature biotechnology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 15.358
H-Index - 445
eISSN - 1546-1696
pISSN - 1087-0156
DOI - 10.1038/s41587-022-01211-7
Subject(s) - enhancer , enhancer rnas , computational biology , biology , genome , genetics , gene , transcription factor
Mounting evidence supports the idea that transcriptional patterns serve as more specific identifiers of active enhancers than histone marks; however, the optimal strategy to identify active enhancers both experimentally and computationally has not been determined. Here, we compared 13 genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) assays in K562 cells and show that nuclear run-on followed by cap-selection assay (GRO/PRO-cap) has advantages in enhancer RNA detection and active enhancer identification. We also introduce a tool, peak identifier for nascent transcript starts (PINTS), to identify active promoters and enhancers genome wide and pinpoint the precise location of 5' transcription start sites. Finally, we compiled a comprehensive enhancer candidate compendium based on the detected enhancer RNA (eRNA) transcription start sites (TSSs) available in 120 cell and tissue types, which can be accessed at https://pints.yulab.org . With knowledge of the best available assays and pipelines, this large-scale annotation of candidate enhancers will pave the way for selection and characterization of their functions in a time- and labor-efficient manner.