Open AccessCost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data
Author(s) -
NA Limdi,
LH Cavallari,
Craig Lee,
Hillegass Wb,
AM Holmes,
Todd C. Skaar,
Maria Pisu,
Chrisly Dillon,
AL Beitelshees,
Philip E. Empey,
Duarte Jd,
Diaby,
Yan Gong,
Johnson Ja,
John A. Graves,
Shawn Garbett,
Zilu Zhou,
Peterson Jf
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pharmacogenomics journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.804
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1473-1150
pISSN - 1470-269X
DOI - 10.1038/s41397-020-0162-5
Subject(s) - ticagrelor , clopidogrel , medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , conventional pci , prasugrel , cyp2c19 , acute coronary syndrome , aspirin , myocardial infarction , cytochrome p450 , metabolism
Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitors following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CYP2C19 genotype can guide DAPT selection, prescribing ticagrelor or prasugrel for loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers (genotype-guided escalation). Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) are traditionally grounded in clinical trial data. We conduct a CEA using real-world data using a 1-year decision-analytic model comparing primary strategies: universal empiric clopidogrel (base case), universal ticagrelor, and genotype-guided escalation. We also explore secondary strategies commonly implemented in practice, wherein all patients are prescribed ticagrelor for 30 days post PCI. After 30 days, all patients are switched to clopidogrel irrespective of genotype (nonguided de-escalation) or to clopidogrel only if patients do not harbor an LOF allele (genotype-guided de-escalation). Compared with universal clopidogrel, both universal ticagrelor and genotype-guided escalation were superior with improvement in quality-adjusted life years (QALY's). Only genotype-guided escalation was cost-effective ($42,365/QALY) and demonstrated the highest probability of being cost-effective across conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds. In the secondary analysis, compared with the nonguided de-escalation strategy, although genotype-guided de-escalation and universal ticagrelor were more effective, with ICER of $188,680/QALY and $678,215/QALY, respectively, they were not cost-effective. CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet prescribing is cost-effective compared with either universal clopidogrel or universal ticagrelor using real-world implementation data. The secondary analysis suggests genotype-guided and nonguided de-escalation may be viable strategies, needing further evaluation.