Premium
Adiposity and Eating Behaviors in Patients Under Second Generation Antipsychotics
Author(s) -
Blouin Mélissa,
Tremblay Angelo,
Jalbert MarieEve,
Venables Hélène,
Bouchard RochHugo,
Roy MarcAndré,
Alméras Natalie
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1038/oby.2008.277
Subject(s) - disinhibition , appetite , meal , medicine , obesity , body mass index , overeating , weight gain , endocrinology , psychology , psychiatry , body weight
Background: Second generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce substantial weight gain but the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain speculative. Objective: To explore eating behaviors among SGA‐treated patients and compare them with nonschizophrenic healthy sedentary individuals (controls). Methods and Procedures: Appetite sensations were recorded before and after a standardized breakfast using visual analog scales. Three hours after breakfast, a buffet‐type meal was offered to participants to document spontaneous food intake and food preferences. Satiety quotients (SQs) were calculated to determine the satiation of both meals and the Three‐Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was used to document eating behaviors. Body composition and abdominal fat distribution were assessed. Results: Compared with controls ( n = 20), SGA‐treated patients ( n = 18) showed greater adiposity indices ( P ≤ 0.04). Patients' degree of hunger was also higher following the standardized breakfast ( P = 0.03). Moreover, patients had significantly higher cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition, and susceptibility to hunger scores than the reference group ( P ≤ 0.05). Disinhibition in the reference group was positively associated with hunger triggered by external cues ( r = 0.48, P = 0.03) whereas internal cues seem to mainly regulate emotional susceptibility to disinhibition in patients ( r = 0.56, P = 0.02). Higher strategic restraint behavior in patients was associated with decreased satiation right after the buffet‐type meal ( r = −0.56, P = 0.02). Discussion: These exploratory findings suggest that patients under SGA seem to develop disordered eating behaviors in response to altered appetite sensations and increased susceptibility to hunger, a factor which may influence the extent of body weight gain triggered by these drugs.