Premium
Bioelectrical Impedance vs. Four‐compartment Model to Assess Body Fat Change in Overweight Adults
Author(s) -
Chouinard Laura E.,
Schoeller Dale A.,
Watras Abigail C.,
Clark R. Randall,
Close Rachel N.,
Buchholz Andrea C.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1038/oby.2007.510
Subject(s) - bioelectrical impedance analysis , overweight , medicine , placebo , fat mass , body mass index , body fat percentage , physical therapy , alternative medicine , pathology
Objective: The Tanita TBF‐305 body fat analyzer is marketed for home and clinical use and is based on the principles of leg‐to‐leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Few studies have investigated the ability of leg‐to‐leg BIA to detect change in percentage fat mass (%FM) over time. Our objective was to determine the ability of leg‐to‐leg BIA vs. the four‐compartment (4C) model to detect small changes in %FM in overweight adults. Research Methods and Procedures: Thirty‐eight overweight adults (BMI, 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m 2 ; age, 18 to 44 years; 31 women) participated in a 6‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of a nutritional supplement. Body composition was measured at 0 and 6 months using the Tanita TBF‐305 body fat analyzer [using equations derived by the manufacturer (%FM T‐Man ) and by Jebb et al. (%FM T‐Jebb )] and the 4C model (%FM 4C ). Results: Subjects in the experimental group lost 0.9%FM 4C ( p = 0.03), a loss that did not reach significance using leg‐to‐leg BIA (0.6%FM T‐Man , p = 0.151; 0.6%FM T‐Jebb , p = 0.144). We observed large standard deviations (SDs) in the mean difference in %FM between the 4C model and the Tanita Manufacturer (2.5%) and Tanita Jebb (2.2%). Ten subjects fell outside ±1 SD of the mean differences at 0 and 6 months; those individuals were younger and shorter than those within ±1 SD. Discussion: Leg‐to‐leg BIA performed reasonably well in predicting decreases in %FM in this group of overweight adults but resulted in wide SDs vs. %FM 4C in individuals. Cross‐sectional determinations of %FM of overweight individuals using leg‐to‐leg BIA should be interpreted with caution.