z-logo
Premium
Muscle‐associated Triglyceride Measured by Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Author(s) -
LarsonMeyer D. Enette,
Smith Steven R.,
Heilbronn Leonie K.,
Kelley David E.,
Ravussin Eric,
Newcomer Bradley R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.438
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1930-739X
pISSN - 1930-7381
DOI - 10.1038/oby.2006.10
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , triglyceride , computed tomography , nuclear magnetic resonance , medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , radiology , physics , cholesterol
Abstract Objective : Muscle triglyceride can be assessed in vivo using computed tomography (CT) and 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), two techniques that are based on entirely different biophysical principles. Little is known, however, about the cross‐correlation between these techniques and their test—retest reliability. Research Methods and Procedures : We compared mean muscle attenuation (MA) in soleus and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles measured by CT with intra‐ and extramyocellular lipids (IMCL and EMCL, respectively) measured by MRS in 51 volunteers (26 to 72 years of age, BMI = 25.5 to 39.3 kg/m 2 ). MA of midthighs was also measured in a subset ( n = 19). Test—retest measurements were performed by CT ( n = 6) and MRS ( n = 10) in separate sets of volunteers. Results : MA of soleus was significantly associated with IMCL ( r = −0.64) and EMCL, which by multiple regression analysis was explained mostly by IMCL ( p < 0.001) rather than EMCL (β = −0.010, p = 0.94). Muscle triglyc‐eride was lower in TA than in soleus, and MA of TA was significantly correlated with EMCL ( r = −0.40) but not IMCL ( r = −0.16). By CT, MA of midthighs was correlated with MA in soleus ( r = 0.40, p = 0.07) and whole calf ( r = 0.62, p < 0.05). Finally, both MA and IMCL were highly reliable in soleus (coefficient of variation = <2% and 6.7%, respectively) and less reliable in TA (4% and 10%, respectively). Discussion : These results support the use of both CT and MRS as reliable methods for assessing skeletal muscle lipid.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here