z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is the Arte ACC Index a Valid Indicator of Free‐Living Physical Activity in Adolescents?
Author(s) -
Ekelund Ulf,
Åman Jan,
Westerterp Klaas
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
obesity research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1550-8528
pISSN - 1071-7323
DOI - 10.1038/oby.2003.110
Subject(s) - kilogram , energy expenditure , physical activity , basal metabolic rate , doubly labeled water , metabolic equivalent , medicine , zoology , energy metabolism , total energy expenditure , physical activity level , resting energy expenditure , body mass index , body weight , physical therapy , endocrinology , biology
Objective : The principal aim of this study was to validate a proposed new index of physical activity, the activity‐related time equivalent based on accelerometry (Arte ACC ), in adolescents. A secondary aim was to develop regression equations for prediction of total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure [AEE = 0.9 × TEE − resting metabolic rate (RMR)]. Research Methods and Procedures : RMR and energy expenditure (EE) under standardized exercises were measured by indirect calorimetry in 36 adolescents (14 to 19 years old). TEE was measured by the doubly labeled water method, and physical activity was assessed simultaneously with an accelerometer for 14 days. AEE, AEE in relation to body weight (AEE per kilogram), and activity‐related time equivalent based on energy expenditure (Arte EE = AEE/[EE reference activity − RMR]) were calculated from laboratory and free‐living EE data. Arte ACC was calculated as total activity counts/activity counts of reference activity. Results : Arte ACC was significantly related to AEE per kilogram ( r = 0.57; p < 0.0001) and Arte EE ( r = 0.68; p < 0.001). The absolute amount of time (minutes per day) spent in physical activity was significantly lower when calculated from Arte ACC than from Arte EE ( p < 0.001). TEE was significantly influenced by RMR, sex, and Arte ACC ( r 2 = 0.89). AEE was significantly influenced by sex and Arte ACC ( r 2 = 0.59). Discussion : Despite an absolute difference between the two indexes, Arte EE and Arte ACC , Arte ACC seems to be a valid indicator of free‐living physical activity. It contributed significantly, by 3.3% and 12.5%, to the explained variations in TEE and AEE, respectively.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here