Open AccessNeck Circumference as a Simple Screening Measure for Identifying Overweight and Obese Patients
Author(s) -
BenNoun Liubov Louba,
Sohar Ezra,
Laor Arie
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
obesity research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1550-8528
pISSN - 1071-7323
DOI - 10.1038/oby.2001.61
Subject(s) - waist , medicine , overweight , circumference , body mass index , obesity , receiver operating characteristic , cutoff , waist–hip ratio , demography , physical therapy , physics , geometry , mathematics , quantum mechanics , sociology
Objective: There are numerous methods of assessing overweight and obesity. We undertook an observational study to test a method of identifying overweight or obese patients solely by measuring the circumference of the neck. Research Methods and Procedures: A test sample and a second validation sample included 979 subjects (460 men and 519 women), who visited a family medicine clinic in a southern Israeli urban district for any reason between the randomly chosen months of January and September 1998. Main outcome included neck, waist, and hip circumferences; body mass index (BMI); and waist:hip ratio measures. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated a significant association between neck circumference (NC) and: BMI (men, r = 0.83; women, r = 0.71; each, p < 0.0001), age (men, r = 0.33; women, r = 0.36; each, p < 0.0001), weight (men, r = 0.7; women, r = 0.81; each, p < 0.0001), waist circumference (men, r = 0.86; women, r = 0.85; each, p < 0.0001), hip circumference (men, r = 0.62; women, r = 0.56; each, p < 0.0001), and waist:hip ratio (men, r = 0.66; women, r = 0.87; each, p < 0.0001). NC ≥37 cm for men and ≥34 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI ≥25.0 kg/m 2 using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 98% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 94% accuracy for men, and 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% accuracy for women. NC ≥39.5 cm for men and ≥36.5 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 93% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 91% accuracy for men, and 93% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 97% accuracy for women. Discussion: NC measurement is a simple and time‐saving screening measure that can be used to identify overweight and obese patients. Men with NC <37 cm and women with NC <34 cm are not to be considered overweight. Patients with NC ≥37 cm for men and ≥34 cm for women require additional evaluation of overweight or obesity status.