z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Resolving controversies on the path to Alzheimer's therapeutics
Author(s) -
Dennis J. Selkoe
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
nature medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 19.536
H-Index - 547
eISSN - 1546-170X
pISSN - 1078-8956
DOI - 10.1038/nm.2460
Subject(s) - disease , clinical trial , looming , medicine , mechanism (biology) , tragedy (event) , alzheimer's disease , intensive care medicine , psychology , psychiatry , cognitive psychology , epistemology , pathology , philosophy
Alzheimer's disease constitutes a personal and societal tragedy of immense proportions. Since 1960, research in laboratories and clinics worldwide has elucidated many features of this insidious and ultimately fatal syndrome, and this progress has led to initial human trials of potentially disease-modifying agents. However, some of these agents have already failed. Gnawing controversies and important gaps in our knowledge seem to cast additional doubt on the ability of the field to move forward effectively. Here I discuss some of these looming concerns and offer possible explanations for the major trial failures that suggest they are not predictive of the future. Rigorous preclinical validation of mechanism-based therapeutic agents followed by meticulously designed trials that focus on the cardinal cognitive symptoms and their associated biomarkers in the mild or presymptomatic phases of Alzheimer's disease are likely to lead to success, perhaps in the not-too-distant future.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom