z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Uncertainties in transpiration estimates
Author(s) -
Miriam Coenders-Gerrits,
Ruud van der Ent,
Thom Bogaard,
Lan WangErlandsson,
Markus Hrachowitz,
H. H. G. Savenije
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
nature
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 15.993
H-Index - 1226
eISSN - 1476-4687
pISSN - 0028-0836
DOI - 10.1038/nature12925
Subject(s) - transpiration , interception , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , range (aeronautics) , evaporation , soil water , atmospheric sciences , geography , soil science , meteorology , ecology , geology , botany , photosynthesis , geotechnical engineering , materials science , composite material , biology
arising from S. Jasechko et al. Nature 496, 347-350 (2013)10.1038/nature11983How best to assess the respective importance of plant transpiration over evaporation from open waters, soils and short-term storage such as tree canopies and understories (interception) has long been debated. On the basis of data from lake catchments, Jasechko et al. conclude that transpiration accounts for 80-90% of total land evaporation globally (Fig. 1a). However, another choice of input data, together with more conservative accounting of the related uncertainties, reduces and widens the transpiration ratio estimation to 35-80%. Hence, climate models do not necessarily conflict with observations, but more measurements on the catchment scale are needed to reduce the uncertainty range. There is a Reply to this Brief Communications Arising by Jasechko, S. et al. Nature 506, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12926 (2014).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom