Premium
Structural insights into mechanism and specificity of O ‐GlcNAc transferase
Author(s) -
Clarke Andrew J,
HurtadoGuerrero Ramon,
Pathak Shalini,
Schüttelkopf Alexander W,
Borodkin Vladimir,
Shepherd Sharon M,
Ibrahim Adel F M,
van Aalten Daan M F
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the embo journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.484
H-Index - 392
eISSN - 1460-2075
pISSN - 0261-4189
DOI - 10.1038/emboj.2008.186
Subject(s) - biology , tetratricopeptide , transferase , mutagenesis , biochemistry , mutant , phosphorylation , gene , microbiology and biotechnology , enzyme
Post‐translational modification of protein serines/threonines with N ‐acetylglucosamine ( O ‐GlcNAc) is dynamic, inducible and abundant, regulating many cellular processes by interfering with protein phosphorylation. O‐GlcNAcylation is regulated by O ‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O ‐GlcNAcase, both encoded by single, essential, genes in metazoan genomes. It is not understood how OGT recognises its sugar nucleotide donor and performs O ‐GlcNAc transfer onto proteins/peptides, and how the enzyme recognises specific cellular protein substrates. Here, we show, by X‐ray crystallography and mutagenesis, that OGT adopts the (metal‐independent) GT‐B fold and binds a UDP‐GlcNAc analogue at the bottom of a highly conserved putative peptide‐binding groove, covered by a mobile loop. Strikingly, the tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) tightly interact with the active site to form a continuous 120 Å putative interaction surface, whereas the previously predicted phosphatidylinositide‐binding site locates to the opposite end of the catalytic domain. On the basis of the structure, we identify truncation/point mutants of the TPRs that have differential effects on activity towards proteins/peptides, giving first insights into how OGT may recognise its substrates.