z-logo
Premium
Plasma famotidine concentration versus intragastric pH in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in healthy subjects
Author(s) -
Echizen Hirotoshi,
Shoda Ryosuke,
Umeda Noritsugu,
Ishizaki Takashi
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1038/clpt.1988.213
Subject(s) - famotidine , pharmacokinetics , pharmacodynamics , plasma concentration , medicine , clinical pharmacology , chemistry , gastroenterology , pharmacology
To study the concentration‐response relationship of famotidine, we serially monitored intragastric pH and measured plasma drug concentrations simultaneously after an intravenous injection of this H 2 ‐receptor antagonist (0.1 mg/kg) in eight patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in six healthy subjects. By applying the sigmoidal E max model the mean (± SD) plasma famotidine concentrations associated with an intragastric pH of 4.0 in patients and healthy subjects were estimated to be 17.7 ± 10.7 and 24.8 ± 10.3 ng/ml, respectively (not significantly different). No significant differences were observed in the mean pharmacokinetic parameters between the two study groups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that not only a pharmacokinetic factor (i.e., elimination t ½ ) but also a pharmacodynamic (or sensitivity) factor (i.e., a drug concentration associated with an intragastric pH of 4.0) contributed significantly ( p < 0.01) to the overall variability in the duration of antisecretory effect in our study subjects, with standardized partial regression coefficients of 0.54 and ‐ 0.63, respectively. Based on these data, we predict that around‐the‐clock control of a fasting intragastric pH above 4.0 can be attained by a continuous infusion of famotidine at rates ranging from 6 to 25 mg/day (mean ± SD, 11 ± 7 mg/day) in a 70 kg patient whose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics are similar to those of our patients. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (1988) 44 , 690–698; doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.213

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here