z-logo
Premium
Interferon kinetics and adverse reactions after intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection
Author(s) -
Wills Robert J,
Dennis Susana,
Spiegel Herbert E,
Gibson Donald M,
Nadler Paul I
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1038/clpt.1984.101
Subject(s) - intramuscular injection , medicine , subcutaneous injection , adverse effect , dosing , injection site , route of administration , bioavailability , pharmacology , anesthesia
Three groups of six subjects each received a single 36 × 10 6 U dose of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (rIFN‐αA) as a 40‐min infusion, an intramuscular injection, or a subcutaneous injection. Blood samples were collected at specific times after dosing for analysis of rIFN‐αA serum concentrations by an enzyme immunoassay method, ELISA. The rIFN‐αA was rapidly distributed and moderately eliminated (t½ =5.1 hr) after intravenous infusion. The maximum concentrations at the end of intravenous infusion were tenfold the maximum concentrations after intramuscular and subcutaneous injections. Renal tubular secretion or extrarenal elimination was suggested by clearance values of 1.8 times the glomerular filtration rate. After intramuscular and subcutaneous injection, rIFN‐αA was absorbed slowly (time to reach maximum concentration ranged from 4 to 8 hr), which resulted in prolonged serum concentrations. Estimated bioavailability was more than 80% for both intramuscular and subcutaneous injection shares qualitatively the same adverse reactions, the reactions differ in severity and duration. The adverse effects appear to be related to route of administration, of herpes labialis were also noted. There were no significant clinical laboratory abnormalities of medical concern. Although rIFN‐αA injected by intravenous infusion or intramuscular or subcutaneous injection shares qualitatively the same adverse reactions, the reactions differ in severity and duration. The adverse effects appear to be related to route of administration. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (1984) 35, 722–727; doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.101

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here