z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Attentional accounting: Voluntary spatial attention increases budget category prioritization.
Author(s) -
Kellen Mrkva,
Leaf Van Boven
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of experimental psychology. general
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.521
H-Index - 161
eISSN - 1939-2222
pISSN - 0096-3445
DOI - 10.1037/xge0000347
Subject(s) - cued speech , optimal distinctiveness theory , prioritization , psychology , cognitive psychology , psycinfo , visual attention , task (project management) , visual search , mediation , social psychology , cognition , business , medline , political science , process management , management , neuroscience , economics , law
Too often, people fail to prioritize the most important activities, life domains, and budget categories. One reason for misplaced priorities, we argue, is that activities and categories people have frequently or recently attended to seem higher priority than other activities and categories. In Experiment 1, participants were cued to direct voluntary spatial attention toward 1 side of a screen while images depicting different budget categories were presented: 1 category on the cued side and 1 on the noncued side of the screen. Participants rated cued budget categories as higher priority than noncued budget categories. Cued attention also increased perceived distinctiveness, and a mediation model was consistent with the hypothesis that distinctiveness mediates the effect of cued attention on prioritization. Experiment 2 orthogonally manipulated 2 components of a spatial cuing manipulation-heightened visual attention and heightened mental attention-to examine how each influences prioritization. Visual attention and mental attention additively increased prioritization. In Experiment 3, attention increased prioritization even when prioritization decisions were incentivized, and even when heightened attention was isolated from primacy and recency. Across experiments, cued categories were prioritized more than noncued categories even though measures were taken to disguise the purpose of the experiments and manipulate attention incidentally (i.e., as a by-product of an unrelated task). (PsycINFO Database Record

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here