z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dimensions of family–school partnerships for autistic children: Context and congruence.
Author(s) -
Rachel T. Santiago,
Laura Lee McIntyre,
S. Andrew Garbacz
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
school psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.395
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 2578-4226
pISSN - 2578-4218
DOI - 10.1037/spq0000473
Subject(s) - dyad , psychology , developmental psychology , psycinfo , autism , context (archaeology) , socioeconomic status , autism spectrum disorder , family income , clinical psychology , medicine , medline , population , paleontology , environmental health , political science , law , economics , biology , economic growth
Family-school partnerships are crucial for promoting positive outcomes and serving as a protective factor for children at-risk for poor school outcomes (Christenson & Sheridan, 2001). This may be particularly important for autistic children, who are at increased developmental risk (Garbacz et al., 2016). However, little research has examined variables related to dimensions of these partnerships for parents and teachers of autistic children. The present study examined family socioeconomic resources in relation to two dimensions of family-school partnerships (relationship quality and family involvement) among parents of autistic children, as well as dyadic perceptions of relationship quality among parents and teachers of autistic children. Data were collected across two time points (Time 1 N = 68 parents, child ages = 5-11; Time 2 parent-teacher dyad N = 22, child ages = 7-13). Results suggest that (a) higher appraisal of financial resources was associated with higher parent-reported family involvement after controlling for child autism spectrum disorder (ASD) characteristics and (b) higher parent-reported relationship quality and family involvement at one time were significantly associated with positive independent (parent and teacher) and congruent ratings of parent-teacher relationship quality 2 years later. Study limitations, future directions, and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here