
The sex premium in religiously motivated moral judgment.
Author(s) -
Liana S. E. Hone,
Thomas Granville McCauley,
Eric J. Pedersen,
Evan Carter,
Michael E. McCullough
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of personality and social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.455
H-Index - 369
eISSN - 1939-1315
pISSN - 0022-3514
DOI - 10.1037/pspp0000296
Subject(s) - morality , psychology , social psychology , psycinfo , moral reasoning , moral development , moral disengagement , moral psychology , religious identity , religiosity , epistemology , law , medline , philosophy , political science
Recent theorizing suggests that religious people's moral convictions are quite strategic (albeit unconsciously so), designed to make their worlds more amenable to their favored approaches to solving life's basic challenges. In a meta-analysis of 5 experiments and a preregistered replication, we find that religious identity places a sex premium on moral judgments, causing people to judge violations of conventional sexual morality as particularly objectionable. The sex premium is especially strong among highly religious people, and applies to both legal and illegal acts. Religion's influence on moral reasoning emphasizes conventional sexual norms, and may reflect the strategic projects to which religion has been applied throughout history. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).