Open AccessSMART longitudinal analysis: A tutorial for using repeated outcome measures from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions.
Author(s) -
Inbal NahumShani,
Daniel Almirall,
Jamie Yap,
James R. McKay,
Kevin G. Lynch,
Elizabeth Freiheit,
John J. Dziak
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
psychological methods
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.981
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1939-1463
pISSN - 1082-989X
DOI - 10.1037/met0000219
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , psycinfo , computer science , outcome (game theory) , intervention (counseling) , computerized adaptive testing , psychology , management science , medline , clinical psychology , psychometrics , engineering , mathematics , mathematical economics , psychiatry , political science , law
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the development of adaptive interventions across various domains of health and psychological research. An adaptive intervention is a protocolized sequence of individualized treatments that seeks to address the unique and changing needs of individuals as they progress through an intervention program. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental study design that can be used to build the empirical basis for the construction of effective adaptive interventions. A SMART involves multiple stages of randomizations; each stage of randomization is designed to address scientific questions concerning the best intervention option to employ at that point in the intervention. Several adaptive interventions are embedded in a SMART by design; many SMARTs are motivated by scientific questions that concern the comparison of these embedded adaptive interventions. Until recently, analysis methods available for the comparison of adaptive interventions were limited to end-of-study outcomes. The current article provides an accessible and comprehensive tutorial to a new methodology for using repeated outcome data from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions. We discuss how existing methods for comparing adaptive interventions in terms of end-of-study outcome data from a SMART can be extended for use with longitudinal outcome data. We also highlight the scientific utility of using longitudinal data from a SMART to compare adaptive interventions. A SMART study aiming to develop an adaptive intervention to engage alcohol- and cocaine-dependent individuals in treatment is used to demonstrate the application of this new methodology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).