
Using web-based technologies to increase reach, inclusion, and generalizability in behavioral observation research.
Author(s) -
Nicholas S. Perry,
Timothy J. Sullivan,
Karena Leo,
David M. Huebner,
K. Daniel O’Leary,
Brian R. Baucom
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of family psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.138
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1939-1293
pISSN - 0893-3200
DOI - 10.1037/fam0000856
Subject(s) - generalizability theory , observational study , psycinfo , psychology , observational methods in psychology , population , inter rater reliability , inclusion (mineral) , applied psychology , external validity , empirical research , mental health , social psychology , developmental psychology , medline , rating scale , psychotherapist , statistics , medicine , mathematics , environmental health , political science , law
Social scientists have long utilized observations of human behavior in research designs. For researchers studying couples, observation of romantic partners has led to important discoveries about how such behavior is associated with physical, mental, and family health. Historically, these methods have been used in in-person laboratory paradigms that place notable limitations on reach and inclusion. This has, in turn, restricted the generalizability of such research to couples who may not attend an in-person laboratory assessment. Transferring the observational laboratory into an online format has the potential to expand the capabilities of these methods to include more diverse couples. This article presents two empirical studies that used online methods to conduct observational behavioral research with sexual and gender minority couples, populations that could be difficult to reach using traditional methods in many places. We demonstrate that we were able to reach, recruit, and enroll diverse couples that more closely resemble the population of same-sex couples in the United States than likely would have been reached in-person. Further, we show that the quality of the observational data collected via the internet allowed for over 94% of collected data to be coded, with acceptable interrater reliabilities and convergent validity. These studies provide a proof-of-concept of online observational methods, accompanied by a tutorial for using such methods. We discuss possible extensions of these online methods, their limitations, and the potential to help further the field of close relationships by reaching more diverse relationships and increasing the generalizability of our research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).