Open science and multicultural research: Some data, considerations, and recommendations. | Zendy

P. Priscilla Lui | Zendy; Sarah Gobrial | Zendy; Savannah Pham | Zendy; Westley Giadolor | Zendy; Niki Adams | Zendy; David Rollock | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Open science and multicultural research: Some data, considerations, and recommendations.

Author(s) -

P. Priscilla Lui,

Sarah Gobrial,

Savannah Pham,

Westley Giadolor,

Niki Adams,

David Rollock

Publication year - 2022

Publication title -

cultural diversity and ethnic minority psychology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.049

H-Index - 77

eISSN - 1939-0106

pISSN - 1099-9809

DOI - 10.1037/cdp0000541

Subject(s) - psycinfo , credibility , psychology , cultural humility , multiculturalism , cultural diversity , transparency (behavior) , public relations , social psychology , sociology , cultural competence , political science , medline , pedagogy , law , anthropology

There are two potentially useful but nonintersecting efforts to help ensure that psychological science produces valid and credible information and contributes to the understanding of diverse human experiences. Whereas North American ethnic minority psychology research/cultural diversity science (EM/D) emphasizes cultural competency to yield contextualized psychological understanding of understudied and underserved minority populations, current open science (OS) approaches emphasize material and data sharing, and statistical proficiency to maximize the replicability of mainstream findings. To illuminate the extent of and explore reasons for this bifurcation, and OS's potential impact on EM/D, we conducted three studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research