What makes professors appear credible: The effect of demographic characteristics and ideological beliefs.
Author(s) -
Luke Zhu,
Karl Aquino,
Abhijeet K. Vadera
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.522
H-Index - 284
eISSN - 1939-1854
pISSN - 0021-9010
DOI - 10.1037/apl0000095
Subject(s) - credibility , ideology , psychology , psycinfo , social psychology , affect (linguistics) , caste , race (biology) , perception , social perception , politics , sociology , gender studies , medline , political science , communication , neuroscience , law
Five studies are conducted to examine how ideology and perceptions regarding gender, race, caste, and affiliation status affect how individuals judge researchers' credibility. Support is found for predictions that individuals judge researcher credibility according to their egalitarian or elitist ideologies and according to status cues including race, gender, caste, and university affiliation. Egalitarians evaluate low-status researchers as more credible than high-status researchers. Elitists show the opposite pattern. Credibility judgments affect whether individuals will interpret subsequent ambiguous events in accordance with the researcher's findings. Effects of diffuse status cues and ideological beliefs may be mitigated when specific status cues are presented to override stereotypes. (PsycINFO Database Record
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom