A consensus framework for neurofeedback research (and the perils of unfounded neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018). | Zendy

Robert T. Thibault | Zendy; Amir Raz | Zendy

Open Access

A consensus framework for neurofeedback research (and the perils of unfounded neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018).

Author(s) -

Robert T. Thibault,

Amir Raz

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

american psychologist

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.124

H-Index - 230

eISSN - 1935-990X

pISSN - 0003-066X

DOI - 10.1037/amp0000366

Subject(s) - sketch , psycinfo , neurofeedback , constructive , epistemology , medline , computer science , psychology , cognitive science , philosophy , political science , law , psychiatry , algorithm , programming language , electroencephalography , process (computing)

We were pleased to read the constructive commentary (Micoulaud-Franchi & Fovet, 2018) on our original piece (Thibault & Raz, 2017). In this response, we build on the theoretical framework for studying neurofeedback that the commentators sketch out while pointing out potential caveats to adopting a neuroreductionist approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research