z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Norm-of-reaction: Definition and misinterpretation of animal research.
Author(s) -
Steve Platt,
Charles A. Sanislow
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
deleted journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
pISSN - 0735-7036
DOI - 10.1037/0735-7036.102.3.254
Subject(s) - norm (philosophy) , predictability , genotype , range (aeronautics) , mathematics , statistics , biology , genetics , epistemology , philosophy , gene , materials science , composite material
The development of a phenotype is due to an interaction of the genotype with the environment. Two terms have been used to describe the outcome of this interaction, the norm-of-reaction and the reaction range. The first represents the theoretically limitless distribution of the phenotypes that may be expressed by a given genotype. The reaction range implies an upper and lower limit for phenotype expression possible from a given genotype. A critical distinction between the reaction range and the norm-of-reaction is that the norm-of-reaction is a statement of the conceivable interactions found but does not imply any predictability other than that within the conditions previously tested experimentally, that is, the tails of a normal distribution are infinitely variable, whereas the concept of reaction range implies a limitation inherent in the genotype, that is, a finite range. Empirical support for the reaction-range concept is questionable. Animal studies cited in support of the reaction range have been inappropriately and incorrectly interpreted.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom