Premium
Application of a model of scale dependence to quantify scale domains in open predation experiments
Author(s) -
Englund Göran,
Cooper Scott D.,
Sarnelle Orlando
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
oikos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.672
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1600-0706
pISSN - 0030-1299
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920311.x
Subject(s) - predation , predator , scale (ratio) , ecology , spatial ecology , functional response , biology , geography , cartography
We use a model of open predation experiments to define scale domains that differ in terms of the controlling processes and scale dependence of predator impacts. For experimental arenas that are small compared to the movements of the prey (small scale domain) the model predicts that predator impacts are scale independent and controlled by prey movements. For arenas of intermediate scale we predict that predator impacts are scale dependent and controlled by both prey movements and direct predation, and for the largest scale domain we predict weak scale dependence and predation control.
We propose that the scale‐domain concept is useful when designing and interpreting field experiments. As an illustration we apply the concept to experiments examining predator effects on the stream benthos. First, we test two key assumptions of the underlying model: that area‐specific prey migration rates decrease with increasing size of experimental arenas and that predation rates are independent of arena size. For this purpose we used published estimates of prey emigration and predator consumption rates for nine studies examining the effects of stream predators on benthic prey. We found that prey per capita emigration rates but not predation rates decreased with increasing arena length.
Second, we demonstrate a method for identifying the scale domain of real experiments. The model of predation experiments was parameterized using experimental data and the expected spatial and temporal scale dependence of predator impacts on prey in these experiments was simulated. The simulations suggest that the studies conducted in the largest arenas (length 15–35 m) should be classified as large‐scale, consumption‐controlled experiments, whereas the experiments conducted in smaller arenas (length 1.5–6 m) should be classified as small or intermediate‐scale. We also attempted to determine the scale domain of the experiments in a large data set, including results from most published stream predation experiments. The majority of arenas used in these experiments (73%) were smaller than 1 m in length. Our data on the scale dependence of predation and prey migration rate suggest that experiments in this scale range (<1 m) should be classified as small‐scale, movement‐controlled experiments for most prey taxa.