Premium
Five‐year maintenance follow‐up of early‐onset periodontitis patients
Author(s) -
Kamma Joanna J.,
Baehni Pierre C.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00289.x
Subject(s) - treponema denticola , medicine , bleeding on probing , actinobacillus , dentistry , periodontitis , porphyromonas gingivalis , clinical attachment loss , bacteroides , fusobacterium nucleatum , prevotella intermedia , gingival and periodontal pocket , chronic periodontitis , population , biology , genetics , environmental health , bacteria
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological status of patients with early‐onset or aggressive periodontitis (EOP) who had received supportive periodontal care (SPC) every 3–6 months for a period of 5 years, following active periodontal treatment. Material & Methods: The study population consisted of 25 individuals with early‐onset periodontitis. Clinical examination and recordings of probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were performed at baseline prior to treatment (T0), 3 months following the termination of active periodontal treatment (T1) and annually at the SPC appointments (T2,T3,T4,T5). Microbiological samples were obtained at the 5‐year SPC (T5). Subgingival plaque samples for each individual were collected from one deep pocket (>5 mm), based on pretreatment measurements, randomly selected in each quadrant. The levels of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola were determined using oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Results: During the 5‐year period, the mean of SPC/patient was 12.7 sessions. A significant improvement was observed in PPD, CAL, gingival bleeding index and suppuration following treatment. However, between T1 and T5, 134 sites in 20 patients deteriorated with a CAL loss of≥2 mm. Out of these 134 sites showing disease progression, microbial samples were randomly obtained in 13 sites (9.7%) from 8 patients. Among other factors, smoking and stress were found to have significant predictive value on the future attachment loss. P. gingivalis, T. denticola and total bacterial load were statistically significantly higher in patients who experienced disease progression during the 5‐year maintenance period. Conclusions: For most EOP patients, regular SPC was effective in maintaining clinical and microbiological improvements attained after active periodontal therapy. However, a small percentage of sites was identified as progressive in 20 patients. Variables found to be related to periodontal progression were the presence of as well as the high bacterial counts of P. gingivalis, T. denticola and total bacterial load, number of acute episodes, number of teeth lost, smoking and stress.