Premium
In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images
Author(s) -
Woo B. M. S.,
Zee K.Y.,
Chan F. H. Y.,
Corbet E. F.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00236.x
Subject(s) - subtraction , radiography , nuclear medicine , digital radiography , biomedical engineering , dental alveolus , medicine , scanner , mathematics , orthodontics , artificial intelligence , radiology , computer science , arithmetic
Objectives: To calibrate and validate a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images for quantification of alveolar bone changes by means of computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) in vitro. Materials and Methods: Noise levels were determined using 10 standardized periapical radiographs of the same lower molar region in a human dry skull. For validation of the system, radiographs were taken before and after bovine bone particles in measures with increments of 2 mg weighing from 2 to 20 mg were added into each socket of three dry skulls. Radiographs were developed and scanned into a computer with a flatbed scanner. After digitization, the images were subjected to alignment, normalization and subtraction. Appropriate regions of interest (ROIs) were selected and their CADIA values were calculated for the determination of noise levels, and correlations between the CADIA values and the actual bone mass were performed. Results: When the threshold value was 7, the percentage of pixels deviating from the set threshold value was small (0–11.3%). There were statistically significant correlations between the actual bone mass and the CADIA value for anterior sockets ( p <0.001, r 2 =0.89) and posterior sockets ( p <0.001, r 2 =0.9). For pooled data of both anterior and posterior sockets, the correlation was also statistically significant ( p <0.001, r 2 =0.88). Conclusions: A high and statistically significant correlation between the actual bone mass and CADIA value was obtained, which suggests that the system could be suitable for the detection of small alveolar bone changes.