Premium
Microbiological parameters associated with IL‐1 gene polymorphisms in periodontitis patients
Author(s) -
Socransky S. S.,
Haffajee A. D.,
Smith C.,
Duff G. W.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of clinical periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.456
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1600-051X
pISSN - 0303-6979
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027011810.x
Subject(s) - tannerella forsythia , treponema denticola , fusobacterium nucleatum , prevotella intermedia , genotype , biology , fusobacterium , periodontitis , buccal swab , microbiology and biotechnology , chronic periodontitis , campylobacter , porphyromonas gingivalis , bacteroides , medicine , pathology , genetics , gene , bacteria , honeysuckle , alternative medicine , traditional chinese medicine
Background, aims: Polymorphisms in the cluster of IL‐1 genes have been significantly associated with the severity of adult periodontitis. The purpose of this study was to compare microbiological parameters in IL‐1 genotype negative and positive adult subjects with a range of periodontitis severities. Method: The study included 108 subjects in good general health. Clinical parameters were recorded at 6 sites/tooth excluding 3rd molars and included: plaque accumulation, gingival erythema, bleeding on probing, suppuration, pocket depth and attachment level. Subgingival plaque samples were collected from the mesiobuccal surface of up to 28 teeth in each subject (mean 25.3) providing a total of 2736 samples. The levels of 40 subgingival taxa were determined in each sample using checkerboard DNA‐DNA hybridization. Fingerstick blood samples were collected for IL‐1A (+4845) and IL‐1B (+3954) genotyping using PCR‐based methods. Results: The proportion of IL‐1 genotype positive subjects that exhibited mean counts of specific subgingival species above selected thresholds was significantly higher than the proportion of genotype negative subjects. Prominent among species that were detected at higher levels in genotype positive subjects were members of the “red” and “orange” complexes and included: Bacteroides forsythus, Treponema denticola, the Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies, Fusobacterium periodonticum, Campylobacter gracilis, Campylobacter showae and Streptococcus constellatus. Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus gordonii and 3 Capnocytophaga species were also detected more frequently at high numbers in genotype positive subjects. Significantly higher mean counts of B. forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis, T. denticola , the F. nucleatum subspecies, F. periodonticum , Campylobacter rectus , C. showae , Eubacterium nodatum , S. constellatus , S. gordonii , and S. intermedius were detected at periodontal pockets >6 mm in subjects who were genotype positive when compared with genotype negative subjects. The increase was due to increased numbers of cells of these species rather than a major shift in proportion. Conclusion: The data suggest that genotype positive subjects more frequently had higher levels of “red” and “orange” complex species that are known to be strongly associated with measures of periodontal inflammation.