Open AccessConspecific brood parasitism and egg rejection in Great‐tailed Grackles
Author(s) -
Peer Brian D.,
Sealy Spencer G.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of avian biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.022
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1600-048X
pISSN - 0908-8857
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-048x.2000.310301.x
Subject(s) - brood parasite , biology , emberizidae , nest (protein structural motif) , parasitism , zoology , incubation , brood , host (biology) , ecology , biochemistry , habitat
In this study, we tested whether conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) has selected for egg rejection behavior in the colonial Great‐tailed Grackle Quiscalus mexicanus . No evidence of CBP was recorded at 797 Great‐tailed Grackle nests, and we did not induce CBP by experimentally removing nests while grackles were laying. We determined experimentally that Great‐tailed Grackles are determinate layers, an attribute opposite to that sometimes associated with CBP. Despite the absence of CBP, Great‐tailed Grackles rejected 8% of experimentally introduced conspecific eggs, rarely rejecting or damaging their own eggs. Conspecific eggs added to nests during incubation tended to be rejected more frequently than eggs switched between nests, and eggs that differed the most from the host's eggs tended to be rejected sooner. There was no relationship between rejection and the stage of the nest cycle when experimental parasitism occurred; however, eggs were rejected faster when added during the prelaying and incubation stages than during laying. Evidence suggests, therefore, that egg rejection behavior in Great‐tailed Grackles has not evolved in response to CBP.