Visual impairment in adult people with moderate, severe, and profound intellectual disability

. Purpose: To assess visual impairment in adults with intellectual disability after de‐institutionalisation. Patients: The county has a population of 385 483 persons of 18 years and older; 961 were moderately, severely or profoundly intellectually impaired (ID), 837 of them (87 %) participated in the investigation. Methods: Visual acuity, VA : Østerberg picture charts and reduced copies for near vision could be used in 71% of the patients. Teller preferential looking procedure was applied to people who were unable to cooperate with the picture charts. When examined with picture wall chart VA 0.3‐≥0.10) was found in 10.8%, severe low vision in 1.2% (VA <0.10‐≥0.05), and blindness (VA<0.05) in 3.8%. Poor near vision (<0.3) was present in 19%. Those assessed with Teller acuity cards had poorer vision than the others. It is possible that the low values of assessment with Teller cards represent a combination of gnostic and resolution deficiences, which means that the results of grating VA and recognition VA are non‐comparable. Ophthalmic Disorders The most widespread medical condition was cerebral visual impairment, the most frequent eye disorders were optic atrophy, high myopia, cataract, and keratoconus. Refraction: Refraction was assessed in 710 persons (85%), the most prevalent cause of visual impairment was uncorrected ametropia. Hypermetropia of >+1.50 was found in 151 of 710 subjects (21%), and spectacles were used by 106 (15%); myopia <−1.0 was present in 213 individuals (30%), 95 persons (13%) had lenses <−1.0. Conclusion: Resettled adult people with intellectual disability have a high prevalence of treatable visual impairment. A structured scheme of referral to optometric and ophthalmological care is essential if these people are to be given the care to which they are entitled.