
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease
Author(s) -
Seregard Stefan
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1600-0420
pISSN - 1395-3907
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001091.x
Subject(s) - angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia , medicine , kimura's disease , dermatology , eosinophilia , disease , pathology
. Purpose: To emphasize the differences between angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) and Kimura’s disease (KD), two entities often confused in the ophthalmic literature. Methods: Case report of a subcutaneous mass in the periocular region of a 45‐year old woman and a MEDLINE review of the ophthalmic and non‐ophthalmic literature on ALHE and KD. Results: The clinical and histopathological findings of the present case were consistent with ALHE, but not with KD. A survey of the current ophthalmic literature indicates that these two designations are still often used synonymously, despite that non‐ophthalmic papers now separate ALHE from KD. Conclusion: The clinical and histopathological features of ALHE are most often distinctly different from KD and these entities should be clearly separated in the ophthalmic literature.