z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease
Author(s) -
Seregard Stefan
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1600-0420
pISSN - 1395-3907
DOI - 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001091.x
Subject(s) - angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia , medicine , kimura's disease , dermatology , eosinophilia , disease , pathology
. Purpose: To emphasize the differences between angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) and Kimura’s disease (KD), two entities often confused in the ophthalmic literature. Methods: Case report of a subcutaneous mass in the periocular region of a 45‐year old woman and a MEDLINE review of the ophthalmic and non‐ophthalmic literature on ALHE and KD. Results: The clinical and histopathological findings of the present case were consistent with ALHE, but not with KD. A survey of the current ophthalmic literature indicates that these two designations are still often used synonymously, despite that non‐ophthalmic papers now separate ALHE from KD. Conclusion: The clinical and histopathological features of ALHE are most often distinctly different from KD and these entities should be clearly separated in the ophthalmic literature.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here