Premium
Consultants' opinion on a new practice‐based assessment programme for first‐year residents in anaesthesiology
Author(s) -
Ringsted C.,
Østergaard D.,
Scherpbier A.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460910.x
Subject(s) - representativeness heuristic , medicine , relevance (law) , medical education , psychology , social psychology , political science , law
Background: Assessment in postgraduate education is moving towards using a broad spectrum of practice‐based assessment methods. This approach was recently introduced in first‐year residency in anaesthesiology in Denmark. The new assessment programme covers: clinical skills, communication skills, organizational skills and collaborative skills, scholarly proficiencies and professionalism. Eighteen out of a total of 21 assessment instruments were used for pass/fail decisions. The aim of this study was to survey consultants' opinions of the programme in terms of the representativeness of competencies tested, the suitability of the programme as a basis for pass/fail decisions and the relevance and sufficiency of the content of the different assessment instruments. Methods: A description of the assessment programme and a questionnaire were sent to all consultants of anaesthesiology in Denmark. The questionnaire consisted of items, to be answered on a five‐point scale, asking the consultants' opinions about representativeness, suitability and content of the programme. Results: The response rate was 251/382 (66%). More than 75% of the respondents agreed that the assessment programme offered adequate coverage of the competencies of a first‐year resident and was appropriate for making pass/fail decisions. There was strong agreement that the content of the 18 tests used for pass/fail decisions was relevant and sufficient for pass/fail decisions. Conclusion: Judging from the consultants' opinions, the assessment programme for first‐year residency in anaesthesiology appears to be appropriate regarding the range of competencies assessed, the appropriateness as a basis for pass/fail decisions, and regarding the content of the tests used for pass/fail decisions. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the programme in practice.