Premium
The pressure at the lower inflexion point has no relation to airway collapse in surfactant‐treated premature lambs
Author(s) -
Ingimarsson J.,
Björklund L. J.,
Larsson A.,
Werner O.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006690.x
Subject(s) - medicine , airway , anesthesia , gestational age , pulmonary surfactant , lung volumes , airway obstruction , pulmonary compliance , loop (graph theory) , positive end expiratory pressure , tidal volume , lung , respiratory system , mechanical ventilation , pregnancy , mathematics , physics , combinatorics , biology , genetics , thermodynamics
Background: The lower inflexion point (LIP) on the inspiratory part of the pressure–volume (PV) loop has been suggested to be related to the pressure at which air spaces collapse. Our hypothesis is that airway collapse might instead be assessed from the upper inflexion point on the expiratory part of the PV‐loop (UIP exp ), where lung volume starts to decrease significantly. We therefore examined whether there was a relation between LIP and UIP exp in premature surfactant‐treated lambs. Methods: Ten lambs, at 119–141 days of gestational age, were delivered by cesarean section and given 200 mg/kg modified natural porcine surfactant before the first breath. The lambs were then connected to a ventilator and PV‐loops using airway pressures of 0–35–0 (ZEEP‐loop) and 5–35–5 cmH 2 O (PEEP‐loop) were obtained after lung recruitment at 15, 60 and 120 min after birth. From the loops, LIP, UIP exp , upper inflexion point of the inspiratory part of the loop (UIP insp ), inspiratory capacity (IC) as well as inspiratory and expiratory maximal compliance of the respiratory system (Crs insp and Crs exp ) were calculated. Results: The ZEEP‐loop showed a substantial hysteresis with a distinct LIP at 19±2 cmH 2 O (mean±SD), which was different ( P <0.001) from UIP exp (9±2 cmH 2 O). The pressures at LIP and UIP exp were unrelated (r 2 =0.06). UIP insp was located at 28±2 cmH 2 O. Crs insp was 2.1±0.6 ml · cmH 2 O −1 · kg −1 , which was lower ( P <0.001) than Crs exp (2.8±0.6 ml · cmH 2 O −1 · kg −1 ). IC was 26±6 ml/kg. The PEEP‐loop had a minimal hysteresis with an expiratory part coinciding with that of the ZEEP‐loop. Conclusion: In surfactant‐treated premature lambs the pressures at LIP and UIP exp are not related, showing that LIP does not indicate the pressure at which airways collapse.