Premium
Activity of enzymatic antioxidant defense systems in chilled and heat shocked cucumber seedling radicles
Author(s) -
Kang HoMin,
Saltveit Mikal E.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130414.x
Subject(s) - radicle , seedling , glutathione reductase , peroxidase , catalase , superoxide dismutase , chemistry , apx , antioxidant , horticulture , hsp70 , heat shock protein , food science , glutathione peroxidase , botany , biochemistry , biology , enzyme , gene
Chilling whole cucumber seedlings that had 10‐mm long radicles for 4 days at 2.5°C significantly inhibited subsequent radicle growth both by increasing the time it took the seedlings to recover from chilling and attain a linear rate of radicle growth, and by decreasing the subsequent rate of linear growth. Exposing cucumber seedlings to 45°C for up to 20 min had no effect on subsequent radicle growth, while longer exposures produced reductions in growth. A heat shock at 45°C for 10 min induced the optimal protection to 4 days of chilling at 2.5°C by reducing chilling inhibition from 60 to 42%. Two hours after being chilled, heat shocked or heat shocked and then chilled, there was no difference in protein content of the apical 1 cm of the seedling radicle among these treatments and the non‐heat shocked, non‐chilled control. Two days after treatment, the protein content was still similar in tissue that had been heat shocked or heat shocked and chilled, while it was significantly reduced in tissue that had been chilled. In general, 2 h after treatment, the activity of the 5 antioxidant enzymes examined in this study [superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1), catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6), ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX; EC 1.11.1.7) and glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2)] were reduced by chilling and unaffected or increased by heat shock. When heat shock was followed by chilling, there was a consistent effect of the heat shock treatment on preventing the loss of enzyme activity following chilling. This protective effect of the heat shock treatment was even more pronounced after 2 days of recovery at 25°C for SOD, CAT and APX. In contrast, the activity of GR and GPX was substantially higher in chilled tissue than in tissue that had been heat shocked before being chilled. Elevated levels of GR and GPX therefore appear to be correlated with the development of chilling injury, while elevated levels of SOD, CAT and APX appear to be correlated with the development of heat shock‐induced chilling tolerance.