Premium
Effects of light quality on somatic embryogenesis in Araujia sericifera
Author(s) -
Torné Josep M.,
Moysset Luisa,
Santos Mireya,
Simón Esther
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110319.x
Subject(s) - polyamine , photoperiodism , petal , chemistry , methylglyoxal , phytochrome , biology , biochemistry , red light , microbiology and biotechnology , botany , enzyme
The effects of photoperiod, light quality and end‐of‐day (EOD) phytochrome photoconversion on somatic embryogenesis (SE) of Araujia sericifera petals have been studied. Petals from immature flowers were cultured under 8‐ and 16‐h photoperiods using Gro‐lux fluorescent lamps. The photon fluence rate was 90–100 μmol m −2 s −1 and the red (R):far‐red (FR) ratio was 98. R, FR, R followed by FR (R‐FR) and FR followed by R (FR‐R) light treatments were applied for 3 weeks at the end of the photoperiods. In a set of experiments, dl ‐ α ‐difluoromethylarginine (DFMA) or methylglyoxal bis (guanylhydrazone) (MGBG), both inhibitors of polyamine biosynthesis, were added to the culture medium in order to study the involvement of polyamine metabolism. The level of SE was the same in long (LD) and short (SD) days. Thus, the light effect was accomplished after 8 h. All EOD treatments that decreased the P fr level inhibited SE when applied after SD, but not after LD. The FR‐R treatment after LD caused an additional stimulatory effect on SE, even in the presence of polyamine inhibitors. DFMA inhibited SE in both SD and LD, but MGBG did not modify SE in either SD or LD. The R, FR and R‐FR treatments did not alter the level of SE when applied after LD in the presence of DFMA or MGBG. However, these treatments decreased SE after SD when the medium contained polyamine inhibitors. Our results suggest that Gro‐lux lamps, which produce an extremely high R:FR ratio, promote SE in A. sericifera and a timing response to phytochrome photoconversion during photoperiodic induction. Thus, our data corroborate the involvement of phytochromes and polyamines in SE in A. sericifera, which responded as a light‐dominant long‐day plant.