z-logo
Premium
The influence of the mycorrhiza Glomus etunicatum on drought acclimation in safflower and wheat
Author(s) -
Bryla D. R.,
Duniway J. M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040112.x
Subject(s) - biology , agronomy , turgor pressure , acclimatization , glomus , water use efficiency , osmotic pressure , mycorrhiza , horticulture , botany , symbiosis , irrigation , genetics , bacteria , inoculation
A study was done to determine the effects of vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) colonization on drought acclimation of host plants. Safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L. cv. S555) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Anza) were grown under environmentally controlled conditions with or without the VAM fungus, Glomus etunicatum Becker and Gerd., and were either acclimated (by pre‐exposing plants to a 10–11 day drought period) or unacclimated to drought. Plants from all treatments were then exposed to drought for 9 days, and plant water status and root water uptake were measured. To minimize interactions between drought and P uptake, growth periods were adjusted so that acclimated and unacclimated plants were similar in size when measurements were made. When wheat was acclimated to drought, osmotic adjustment occurred (leaf solute potentials of leaf tissue rehydrated to full turgor were approximately 0.5 MPa lower in acclimated than unacclimated plants); in safflower, osmotic adjustment was minimal when plants were acclimated. Consequently, acclimated wheat plants were able to tolerate drought better than unacclimated plants, and maintained higher leaf water potentials and relative water contents as soil water was depleted. For both safflower and wheat, acclimated plants had higher water use efficiency, and therefore produced more biomass when water availability was limited, than unacclimated plants. However, mycorrhizal colonization did not affect osmotic adjustment, plant water status, water use efficiency or water uptake in either plant species, and therefore had no effect on drought acclimation or resistance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here