Premium
Effect of macrovescicular steatosis and other donor and recipient characteristics on the outcome of liver transplantation
Author(s) -
Zamboni Fausto,
Franchello Alessandro,
David Ezio,
Rocca Giuseppe,
Ricchiuti Alessandro,
Lavezzo Bruna,
Rizzetto Mario,
Salizzoni Mauro
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150109.x
Subject(s) - steatosis , medicine , liver transplantation , gastroenterology , liver function , liver function tests , transplantation , ischemia , intensive care unit
The influence of steatosis and of other donor and recipient characteristics in affecting liver performance post‐orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was evaluated in 311 consecutive liver transplantations made in 278 patients. Donor variables considered were age, sex, blood group, cause of death, intensive care unit (ICU) days, need for vasopressors, hepatic enzymes and bilirubin, total and warm ischemia time, and macro‐ and microvescicular steatosis. Recipient variables considered were age, sex, blood group, biliary output, and post‐OLT peak levels of hepatic enzymes. Patient and graft survival were the main outcome indicators.
In the multivariate analysis, macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes was the only variable independently associated with shorter patient survival (p<0.05). Five (62.5%) of the eight livers with macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes incurred in a delayed non‐function (DNF) and one (12.5%) in a primary non‐function (PRNF). The incidence of DNF and PRNF in the group with macrovescicular steatosis involving less than 25% of the liver cells was 1.6% (p<0.001) and 2.3%, respectively. Microvescicular steatosis of any degree was not associated with a worse prognosis.
Macrovescicular steatosis involving 25% or more of the hepatocytes identifies marginal livers, the use of which significantly increases the risk of graft non‐function post‐OLT.