Premium
Excellent long‐term graft survival in low risk, primary renal allografts treated with prednisolone‐avoidance immunosuppression
Author(s) -
Elias Tony J,
Bannister Kym M,
Clarkson Anthony R,
Russ Graeme R,
Mathew Timothy H,
Barratt Lindsay J,
Faull Randall J
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140210.x
Subject(s) - medicine , immunosuppression , prednisolone , term (time) , kidney transplantation , surgery , kidney , urology , transplantation , immunology , physics , quantum mechanics
Primary avoidance of oral corticosteroids for renal transplant recipients is uncommon. The South Australian renal transplant service used a double therapy (DT) regimen of cyclosporin and azathioprine from August 1986 to July 1996 for low risk (first graft, PRA<50%) allografts. Oral corticosteroid, prednisolone (P), was reserved for severe rejection or two mild rejection episodes, but could be later withdrawn at the physician's discretion. This regimen is associated with more early acute rejection (Russ et al., Clin Transplant 1990: 4: 26). We have now analysed long‐term patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) for this group. Of 448 transplants in South Australia between August 1986 and July 1996, 295 commenced DT regimen. Ninety‐four (31.8%) never received P at any stage post‐transplantation (group 1), 96 (32.5%) were placed on P and later weaned (group 2), and 97 (33%) remained on long‐term P (group 3). Technical losses, eight (2.7%), within 30 d of transplantation, were excluded from sub‐group analysis. PS for the total DT cohort at 1, 5 and 9 yr post‐transplantation was 97, 88 and 74%, respectively. GS over the same time period was 88, 75 and 55%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival compared to other ‘low risk’ grafts in the rest of Australia during the same time period. Mean serum creatinine concentration (CrC) for the DT group at 3 and 6 months and 1, 3, 5 and 10 yr was not significantly different to the rest of the Australian ‘low risk’ grafts. In the DT cohort, there were 334 acute rejections (<90 d) in 206 patients (70%), but only 42 (12.5%) required anti‐lymphocyte antibody therapy (OKT3 or ATG) for rejection. PS at 9 yr was not statistically significantly different between groups 1 and 2, but both groups survived better than group 3 (p<0.0043). GS for group 1 at 1, 5 and 9 yr post‐transplantation was 90, 81 and 73%, respectively; for group 2, 98, 87 and 66%, respectively; and for group 3, 84, 63 and 29%, respectively. Statistical significance was reached in group 1 versus 3 (p<0.001) and group 2 versus 3 (p<0.001). In summary, a DT regimen in low risk, first renal allografts gives excellent long‐term patient and GS and minimises long‐term P, despite a high rate of early acute rejection.