Premium
The genetics of osteoporosis: ‘complexities and difficulties’
Author(s) -
Giguère Yves,
Rousseau François
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
clinical genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.543
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1399-0004
pISSN - 0009-9163
DOI - 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.570301.x
Subject(s) - osteoporosis , genome wide association study , candidate gene , genetics , genetic association , biology , allele , disease , context (archaeology) , locus (genetics) , single nucleotide polymorphism , bioinformatics , medicine , gene , endocrinology , genotype , paleontology
Osteoporosis is characterized by a decrease in bone mass as well as a deterioration of the bone architecture resulting in an increased risk of fracture. Although the disease is multifactorial, twin studies have shown that genetic factors account for up to 80% of the variance in bone mineral density, the best known predictor of the risk of osteoporosis. Some loci, such as the vitamin D and estrogen receptor genes, as well as the collagen type Iα1 locus, are promising genetic determinants of bone mass, and possibly other bone phenotypes, but this is controversial and the molecular basis of osteoporosis remains largely undefined. Considering that the effect of each candidate gene is expected to be modest, discrepancies between allelic association studies may have arisen because different populations carry different genetic backgrounds and exposure to environmental factors. Also, we realize the importance of gene–gene as well as gene–environment interactions as significant determinants of bone density and risk of osteoporosis. The use of new tools such as small nucleotide polymorphism maps now allows the possibility to perform allelic association studies in the context of whole‐genome search. However, specific study design strategies in large epidemiological studies as well as the best statistical approach will need to be established. We may expect the development of population‐specific at‐risk profiles for osteoporosis that would include genetic and environmental factors, as well as their interactions. This should eventually lead to better prevention strategies and more adapted therapies against osteoporosis.