Premium
Mite fauna in the home and sensitivity to house‐dust and storage mites
Author(s) -
Warner A,
Boström S,
Möller C,
Kjellman Nim,
Warner A
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.363
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1398-9995
pISSN - 0105-4538
DOI - 10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00850.x
Subject(s) - mite , dust mites , acari , biology , pyroglyphidae , fauna , house dust mite , acariformes , allergen , zoology , ecology , veterinary medicine , toxicology , allergy , immunology , medicine
In search of potential new indoor allergen sources, all mites in dust from homes of 55 asthmatic children living in three climatic regions in Sweden were counted and identified by light microscope. Antibodies of the IgE class against three house‐dust mites and three storage mites were measured in corresponding serum samples. Mites were found in all but two homes from the northernmost area, where levels also were lower than in the other regions. The highest mite densities were most often found in bedrooms (50%) and living rooms (40%). Mite density was increased in homes with high humidity and was higher in bungalows than in flats. House‐dust mites predominated in the south and storage mites in the east central area, particularly in kitchens and bathrooms. Mite‐density and IgE‐antibody levels against house‐dust mites were significantly associated. The same association applied to storage mites. Other species numbered around 100 mites/g dust in some homes. Microscopy helps to identify potentially important mites. Analysing home dust only for house‐dust mites will underestimate mite exposure. Storage mites may be as relevant to sensitivity as house‐dust mites. As other species occasionally were found in high numbers, their relevance should also be assessed.