Premium
Effects of Clearcutting and Slash Burning on Streamwater Chemistry and Watershed Nutrient Budgets in Southwestern British Columbia
Author(s) -
Feller M. C.,
Kimmins J. P.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/wr020i001p00029
Subject(s) - clearcutting , slash (logging) , nutrient , environmental science , watershed , hydrology (agriculture) , prescribed burn , ecosystem , zoology , geology , ecology , biology , geotechnical engineering , machine learning , computer science
Two small forested watersheds near Haney in southwestern British Columbia were partially clearcut, and the slash on one of them was subsequently burned. Streamwater chemistry was monitored in these treated watersheds and an undisturbed control watershed for 2 years prior to treatment and up to 9 years after treatment. The chemical parameters that were studied responded differently to the treatments, but there was a general pattern of increased concentrations and fluxes in Streamwater for the first 2–3 years following treatment followed by a decline to, and sometimes below, pretreatment values. The most pronounced increases were observed for K and NO 3 . It was not possible to determine the exact causes of these changes in concentrations and fluxes, due to the great variability in the ecosystems present. This variability precluded determination of statistically significant changes in annual terrestrial nutrient fluxes and pools. Stream nutrient exports usually were <10 kg/ha/yr for each of N, P, K, and Mg, <20 kg/ha/yr for Na and Cl, and <30 kg/ha/yr for Ca. These values were considerably less than nutrient exports in harvested logs and in losses to the atmosphere during the slashburn. Clearcutting and burning caused greater nutrient losses than Clearcutting alone, particularly in the case of N, where the Clearcutting and Clearcutting and burning treatments resulted in total losses of 245 kg/ha and 1293 kg/ha, respectively, for the first two years after treatment.