Premium
Barometric fluctuations in wells tapping deep unconfined aquifers
Author(s) -
Weeks Edwin P.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/wr015i005p01167
Subject(s) - aquifer , water table , vadose zone , water level , atmospheric pressure , groundwater , hydrogeology , amplitude , tapping , boundary value problem , geology , computation , soil science , flow (mathematics) , environmental science , mechanics , geotechnical engineering , hydrology (agriculture) , mathematics , mathematical analysis , engineering , physics , oceanography , cartography , algorithm , quantum mechanics , geography , mechanical engineering
Water levels in wells screened only below the water table in unconfined aquifers fluctuate in response to atmospheric pressure changes. These fluctuations occur because the materials composing the unsaturated zone resist air movement and have capacity to store air with a change in pressure. Consequently, the translation of any pressure change at land surface is slowed as it moves through the unsaturated zone to the water table, but it reaches the water surface in the well instantaneously. Thus a pressure imbalance is created that results in a water level fluctuation. Barometric effects on water levels in unconfined aquifers can be computed by solution of the differential equation governing the flow of gas in the unsaturated zone subject to the appropriate boundary conditions. Solutions to this equation for two sets of boundary conditions were applied to compute water level response in a well tapping the Ogallala Formation near Lubbock, Texas from simultaneous microbarograph records. One set of computations, based on the step function unit response solution and convolution, resulted in a very good match between computed and measured water levels. A second set of computations, based on analysis of the amplitude ratios of simultaneous cyclic microbarograph and water level fluctuations, gave inconsistent results in terms of the unsaturated zone pneumatic properties but provided useful insights on the nature of unconfined‐aquifer water level fluctuations.