Premium
Bank‐full discharge of rivers
Author(s) -
Williams Garnett P.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/wr014i006p01141
Subject(s) - floodplain , bank , hydrology (agriculture) , flow (mathematics) , environmental science , rating curve , bank failure , geology , geography , geotechnical engineering , physics , business , geomorphology , finance , mechanics , cartography , sediment
Eleven possible definitions of ‘bank‐full’ have been used by various investigators. The active floodplain is the most meaningful bank‐full level to the fluvial geomorphologist, whereas the banks of the valley flat are the most important to engineers. Comparison of 16 ways of determining bank‐full discharge suggests that bank‐full discharge at gaged sites should be obtained from the station's rating curve, where bank‐full gage height is determined from a longitudinal profile of the floodplain along the entire reach. At ungaged sites, bank‐full discharge can be estimated from the empirical equation of this study or from the Gauckler‐Manning equation. In the latter case the resistance coefficient n should be estimated at the field site for bank‐full flow; a measured low‐flow n should not be used. Bank‐full discharge does not have a common recurrence frequency among the rivers studied, and the discharge corresponding to the 1.5‐year recurrence interval in most cases does not represent the bank‐full discharge.