Premium
Attenuation of the Coast Range Ophiolite by extensional faulting, and nature of the Coast Range “Thrust,” California
Author(s) -
Jayko A. S.,
Blake M. C.,
Harms Tekla
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
tectonics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.465
H-Index - 134
eISSN - 1944-9194
pISSN - 0278-7407
DOI - 10.1029/tc006i004p00475
Subject(s) - geology , seismology , subduction , ophiolite , thrust fault , extensional tectonics , fault (geology) , underplating , mesozoic , detachment fault , imbrication , tectonics , extensional definition , paleontology , structural basin
The late Mesozoic Coast Range ophiolite and Great Valley sequence in California were juxtaposed against the Franciscan Complex during a long tectonic history that included imbricate thrust faulting, low‐angle detachment, and high‐angle reverse faulting. Many low‐angle faults previously mapped as thrusts invariably juxtapose younger over older rocks, suggesting a normal sense of offset. We infer that serpentinite melange that is present structurally beneath the Coast Range ophiolite formed above the subduction zone during convergence and was subsequently faulted and further attenuated with upper plate rocks concurrent with extension. Franciscan blueschist‐facies rock is inferred to have been transported from depth to higher structural levels concurrent with underplating and extensional unroofing in the upper plate. The present juxta‐position of the Coast Range ophiolite and Great Valley sequence with Franciscan rocks is commonly controlled by Neogene high‐angle faults. We propose that the term Coast Range thrust is no longer appropriate and that the name should be changed to Coast Range fault.