z-logo
Premium
The relationship between Q E −1 and dispersion in extensional modulus, E
Author(s) -
Lienert Barry R.,
Manghnani Murli H.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/gl017i006p00677
Subject(s) - extensional definition , modulus , physics , power law , dispersion (optics) , bulk modulus , range (aeronautics) , materials science , condensed matter physics , optics , composite material , mathematics , geology , statistics , tectonics , paleontology
We have measured the extensional modulus (ratio of stress to strain, E ) and the fractional energy loss per radian ( Q E ‐1 ) as functions of frequency in cylindrical samples of two solids: a room‐dry sandstone (Berea) and an acrylic plastic (Lucite). In the seismic frequency range (0.1–100 Hz), Q E ‐1 for the sandstone is constant, while the sandstone modulus follows a power law of frequency,   allowing Q E ‐1 to be independently estimated from the slope of log E versus log f . In the same frequency range, Q E ‐1 for the acrylic plastic is not constant but exhibits a slight relaxation peak centered about 2 Hz. In this case Q E ‐1 can be estimated from the derivative, d log E / d log f , i.e., the above power law appears to hold independently at each point in the frequency domain even when Q E ‐1 is varying.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom