z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An evaluation of upper troposphere NO x with two models
Author(s) -
Penner Joyce E.,
Bergmann Daniel J.,
Walton John J.,
Kinnison Douglas,
Prather Michael J.,
Rotman Douglas,
Price Colin,
Pickering Kenneth E.,
Baughcum Steven L.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/98jd01565
Subject(s) - troposphere , stratosphere , tropopause , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , atmosphere (unit) , tracer , greenhouse gas , climatology , meteorology , geology , physics , nuclear physics , oceanography
Upper tropospheric NO x controls, in part, the distribution of ozone in this greenhouse sensitive region of the atmosphere. Many factors control NO x in this region. As a result it is difficult to assess uncertainties in anthropogenic perturbations to NO from aircraft, for example, without understanding the role of the other major NO x sources in the upper troposphere. These include in situ sources (lightning, aircraft), convection from the surface (biomass burning, fossil fuels, soils), stratospheric intrusions, and photochemical recycling from HNO 3 . This work examines the separate contribution to upper tropospheric “primary” NO x from each source category and uses two different chemical transport models (CTMs) to represent a range of possible atmospheric transport. Because aircraft emissions are tied to particular pressure altitudes, it is important to understand whether those emissions are placed in the model stratosphere or troposphere and to assess whether the models can adequately differentiate stratospheric air from tropospheric air. We examine these issues by defining a point‐by‐point “tracer tropopause” in order to differentiate stratosphere from troposphere in terms of NO x perturbations. Both models predict similar zonal average peak enhancements of primary NO x due to aircraft (≈10–20 parts per trillion by volume (pptv) in both January and July); however, the placement of this peak is primarily in a region of large stratospheric influence in one model and centered near the level evaluated as the tracer tropopause in the second. Below the tracer tropopause, both models show negligible NO x derived directly from the stratospheric source. Also, they predict a typically low background of 1‐20 pptv NO x when tropospheric HNO 3 is constrained to be 100 pptv of HNO 3 . The two models calculate large differences in the total background NO x (defined as the source of NO x from lightning + stratosphere + surface + HNO 3 ) when using identical loss frequencies for NO x . This difference is primarily due to differing treatments of vertical transport. An improved diagnosis of this transport that is relevant to NO x requires either measurements of a surface‐based tracer with a substantially shorter lifetime than 222 Rn or diagnosis and mapping of tracer correlations with different source signatures. Because of differences in transport by the two models we cannot constrain the source of NO x from lightning through comparison of average model concentrations with observations of NO x .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here