z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of low‐frequency current variability on near‐inertial submesoscale vortices
Author(s) -
Shay Lynn K.,
Lee Tom N.,
Williams Elizabeth J.,
Graber Hans C.,
Rooth Claes G. H.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/98jc01007
Subject(s) - acoustic doppler current profiler , current (fluid) , geology , boundary current , ocean current , mooring , drifter , amplitude , geodesy , oceanography , physics , lagrangian , quantum mechanics , mathematical physics
From September 30 to October 14, 1993, and from May 18 to June 13, 1994, ocean surface currents along the inshore boundary of the Florida Current were measured using a land‐based ocean surface current radar (OSCR) deployed along the Florida Keys. A dual‐station OSCR mapped the current fields at 20‐min intervals with a horizontal resolution of 1.2 km over a 30×44 km domain using the high‐frequency (HF, 25.4 MHz) mode. An upward looking, narrowband acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) was moored in 150 m of water seaward of the shelf break concurrently sampling the three‐dimensional current vector between 15 and 130 m at 30‐min intervals. Regression analyses between surface and subsurface currents at 15 m depth from the ADCP indicated biases of 3–12 cm s −1 and slopes of O (0.8–1). Root‐mean‐square differences were about 18 cm s −1 because of a 15‐m‐depth separation between the two measurements, and bulk current shears were O (10 −3 s −1 ) in the Florida Current where maximum velocities exceeded 150 cm s −1 between 40 and 70 m. Surface tidal currents were 2–10 cm s −1 in the diurnal and semidiurnal bands and revealed fine‐scale variability in the tidal ellipses due to topographical variations. Differences in the tidal current amplitudes between the surface and 15 m ranged from 1 to 3 cm s −1 in these constituents and explained more of the current variance with depth. During the second experiment a submesoscale surface feature was detected along the shelf break and progressed eastward at a rate of about 30 cm s −1 . This feature was embedded in the near‐inertial wave band where the local inertial period was ≈29 hours that may have been forced by an abrupt change in the wind direction. This transient feature was trapped and advected along the inshore edge of the Florida Current where the anticyclonic vorticity of the subinertial flow shifted the frequency of the nearinertial motions by a few percent of f . These energetic near‐inertial currents of 15–20 cm s −1 had horizontal and vertical wavelengths of 40 km and 50–100 m, respectively.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here